Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
Key Takeaways
- Email and social media work best together, not separately. Social media captures attention. Email deepens that interest and produces tangible results.
- Email and social media mutually reinforce each other. When one channel underperforms, the other one compensates, making the system stronger and more durable.
- A multi-channel marketing system creates sturdy infrastructure, not just flash-in-the-pan campaigns. The results it produces are slow and unglamorous at first, but over time, it compounds into predictable revenue growth.
When I began building my own companies (founding StartupIndex before moving to SaaS tools, including Selzy for email automation), I thought marketing a product was straightforward: Build something valuable, email your customer base and track performance.
When I began building my own companies (founding StartupIndex before moving to SaaS tools, including Selzy for email automation), I thought marketing a product was straightforward: Build something valuable, email your customer base and track performance.
Then the growing number of social platforms increased the noise. Teams abandoned the reliability of established channels as soon as a new platform promised them more reach. New budgets allotted funding to produce more content than ever before. The number of dashboards used to monitor metrics such as impressions skyrocketed. Yet those numbers — for impressions, likes and so on — rarely converted to revenue.
I realized that chasing after every new trend will never result in sustainable growth. You can only capitalize on short-lived spikes in audience interest by tying them back to a stable core that maintains that interest over time.
Social media has its place, but it’s not an either/or choice between social and email. Instead, they are complementary. One in isolation is far less powerful than both working together: Social media is ideal for grabbing someone’s attention. Email provides a way to deepen that interest and produce tangible results.
The problem is not the channel you use
Many marketing teams still work in isolation. For example, the social media team monitors engagement, the email team tracks open and click-through rates, and the paid campaign team figures out how much it costs to acquire a customer. Each team works independently to optimize its own channel.
However, revenue does not grow in neat little silos. A business-to-business buyer may view a company’s LinkedIn post, then watch its video and finally sign up for a free trial of its product after downloading a gated lead magnet. Then weeks later, after seeing the company’s email detailing a product case study, they schedule a demo.
This progression is not random; it’s based on cumulative exposure. And no isolated channel can create this type of progression. Only multiple connected channels can reliably do so.
Email provides the bedrock for your multichannel marketing system
Email continues to be the most consistent marketing channel for securing engagement. According to reports, email generates a return on investment (ROI) of $36-$42 for every dollar spent.
Because email is a permission-based marketing channel. Users choose to submit their email address and, therefore, give your company permission to contact them. On the other hand, social media is algorithm-driven, organic reach decreases frequently, and formats can change or disappear at any moment.
Your email list is not going away tomorrow. Its stability makes it a structure upon which to build a reliable marketing system.
Social platforms provide evidence of interest
While social media is typically thought to be “the top of the funnel,” it often misses the entire point. When someone engages with your social media posts, they are demonstrating interest in your company.
A person who views 80% of a video about your product is evaluating. Another who leaves comments about your workflow tip is interested in your answer. And someone who views your bio link for several minutes is warming to your product.
Your reaction matters. Research shows that people who have already seen targeted content are more likely to convert through email than people encountering your brand for the first time.
Repeating your message creates recognition, which decreases friction.
The handoff creates growth
Here’s how this works. Create content on social that solves a specific problem. It needs to be something real, not just a generic, recycled piece of advice.
Offer a free resource (such as a checklist, template or framework) at the end of the post. For access, users must enter their name and email address. Some will agree and enter their contact information, and now the conversation shifts to email.
Email allows you to present information in order. You can provide additional context or lead users through a process. Social will continue to push your content and provide new entry points into your sales funnel.
The flow of creating content, capturing users and nurturing them is called a “system.” It’s not a bunch of random interactions that seem to have nothing in common. Research shows that multi-channel campaigns work better than single-channel campaigns.
The reason for this is basic human behavior, not magic.
Attribution is clunky — but still helpful
Many times, founders tell me, “I do not know which channel created the sale.” And I believe them. Most buyers go through multiple channels before making a purchase. They may view content from five different sources before finally buying.
It is not necessary to have perfect attribution. Simply track the social media posts that get users to submit their contact information. Then track the emails that result in user interaction with your product.
Add UTM parameters to help connect the dots between channels. Even basic tracking will reveal trends and patterns. There are some posts that always seem to generate signups. There are some email sequences that always seem to generate demo requests. Where these overlap is where you have leverage.
Steady growth wins vs. unpredictable blips
The beauty of joining email and social is that one makes up for what the other lacks. Organic reach from a social platform may drop, but the email list remains active. Alternatively, email list growth may slow down, but social media content can help bring in new signups. This mutual reinforcement makes the system stronger and more durable.
The growth from a coordinated multi-channel approach is typically boring — in a good way. It’s not like a viral spike. Month by month, lists and the number of people who read your emails grow, slowly but surely. Demo requests reliably arrive via social topics followed up with related email content.
A multi-channel system like this creates sturdy infrastructure, not just flash-in-the-pan campaigns. Infrastructure compounds quietly, and predictable growth is usually quiet before it becomes obvious.
I believe predictable growth often follows the same pattern: slow at first, then very noticeable.
Key Takeaways
- Email and social media work best together, not separately. Social media captures attention. Email deepens that interest and produces tangible results.
- Email and social media mutually reinforce each other. When one channel underperforms, the other one compensates, making the system stronger and more durable.
- A multi-channel marketing system creates sturdy infrastructure, not just flash-in-the-pan campaigns. The results it produces are slow and unglamorous at first, but over time, it compounds into predictable revenue growth.
When I began building my own companies (founding StartupIndex before moving to SaaS tools, including Selzy for email automation), I thought marketing a product was straightforward: Build something valuable, email your customer base and track performance.
When I began building my own companies (founding StartupIndex before moving to SaaS tools, including Selzy for email automation), I thought marketing a product was straightforward: Build something valuable, email your customer base and track performance.
Then the growing number of social platforms increased the noise. Teams abandoned the reliability of established channels as soon as a new platform promised them more reach. New budgets allotted funding to produce more content than ever before. The number of dashboards used to monitor metrics such as impressions skyrocketed. Yet those numbers — for impressions, likes and so on — rarely converted to revenue.



